Scientism (Part 5): “One Health”

Rise of surveillance healthcare.

Healthcare is collapsing.

The “pandemic” (in quotes) was a package deal of totalitarian goals—but the healthcare system was its primary target.

The COVID-19 military operation was the planned demolition of healthcare as we know it. Yet this appears to be the greatest disconnect among the general public. Everyone complains about how hospitals and clinics have changed for the worse. But few seem to realize that this was by design.

What’s my evidence for the planned dismantling of healthcare?:

“Flatten the Curve” was policy #1, right?—which accompanied the announcement that a tsunami of death was approaching our shores. Every country was going to shut down its economy.

But what was Policy #1, Flatten the Curve, actually all about?

First of all, Flatten the Curve was a marketing slogan. It was a ubiquitous catchphrase manufactured (NOT out of thin air) to be read aloud by world leaders and health officials everywhere.

The gist of the slogan was this:

“We have a catastrophic health crisis. Therefore, we need all of you to STAY AWAY from hospitals and clinics at all costs.”

Because that’s what you do, right?—when you have a HEALTH crisis?! You tell everyone to stay far away from doctors... nurses... clinics... and emergency rooms? You tell them to hide in their homes, right?—to duck and cover.

Of course, you do.

“Flatten the Curve” has actually NEVER ENDED.

Like the Patriot Act and other temporary security-measure promises, reality NEVER returns to the “Old Normal.” Once they get an inch, they take a mile.

Today, we live in A NEW HEALTHCARE NORMAL…

Hospitals are always inexplicably (yet justifiably) understaffed. And many hospitals have gone bankrupt. Nobody rushes to an emergency room anymore because either (1) they already know they’ll be facing an hours-long backlog, or (2) they are (still!) terrified of “catching COVID” if they go anywhere near a hospital. Interesting how hospitals have become such a health risk in the minds of men.

Conversely, if you’re aware of the COVID-19-ward “death protocols”—such things as Remdesivir, midazolam, ventilators, and being cut off from family (who can check on your progress and protect your interests)—why take the risk? You’re better off just toughing it out.

In Ontario, seniors worry about the very real possibility of being kicked out of their hospital bed—to be shipped off to some far-flung nursing home against their will.

And family physicians (at least where I live) are no longer trustworthy allies. GPs are being stripped of their ability to advocate for their patients freely. For example, during the initial COVID-19 “vaccination campaign,” Ontario physicians faced pressure from their college to avoid granting vaccine exemptions. And these days, going to the wrong clinic on physician off-hours can throw you off your GP’s roster.

But healthcare ads still feature such happy, smiling people.

What’s going on?

The World Health Organization: One Health

The WHO is not a benevolent governmental institution.

The World Health Organization is a PRIVATE arm of the UN that receives most of its financing from the private sector and so-called philanthropic, and “intergovernmental” organizations. Only 20% of the WHO’s yearly budget comes from member states. And in 2020, the corporate press revealed that Bill Gates was the WHO’s second-largest funder.

James Roguski’s Substack provides a dedicated, move-by-move breakdown of the WHO’s ongoing Machiavellian contortions as it marches (and ducks and dodges) its way to crowning itself the ruling hub of a brand new, surveillance-based healthcare model.

You might be asking, what does a series of articles on “low-vibrational” scientism have to do with “Fringe Mystic”-ism and wise insight?

Well, I’ll tell you.

Health care is capable of being MUCH MORE than it has been. Even before the COVID-19 demolition, doctors trained in Rockefeller, allopathic medicine (symptom-based prescription medicine) have been woefully inadequate.

You—man or woman—are not a combination of diseases, disorders, and genetic dispositions. Every dis-ease has a unique experience behind it. When things aren’t going well inside the mind and body, there is a vital story that needs to be sussed out.

Without getting into an entire manifesto, I am CERTAIN that we can do WAY MORE to help people live longer and more prosperous lives.

Excellent health care would involve a multi-team, multidisciplinary approach that starts with a qualified, insightful listener spending much more time listening to the “patient” instead of rushing the patient out the door after a two-question/fifteen-minute limit. And prescription drugs would NOT be the foregone first line of defense by any means.

The guiding principle is that Healthy People Lead Healthy Lives. There is little discussion of “health” in modern medicine. Yet, there is plenty of talk about disease. And none of this came about by accident.

Changing healthcare as we knew it would require a mea culpa and a massive paradigm shift. Part of this would include confronting the reality that pharmaceutical companies have a stranglehold on medical schools and the “healers” they spit out.

There are many lies in modern medicine. And re-envisioning the entire system would be a massive AND rewarding effort.

Assuming that all of this sounds completely out of reach and a little too rose-colored glasses for your liking—there is another option.

In fact, it’s already coming down the pike:

The “One Health” Surveillance State

The decline of the old healthcare model, a downturn that started more than a hundred years ago with John D. Rockefeller, is in its final gasps.

The healthcare reset has already started.

Rising from the ashes of the old model is a more streamlined, efficient vision of health, which will involve not only the health of men, women, and children—but will also take into account plants, animals, ecosystems, and the climate itself.

The catchphrase slogans used to hypnotize the collective subconscious into rolling over and accepting this model include words like “Equity” and “Sustainability” (virtually meaningless).

The foundational theory behind this “One Health” surveillance model—is scientism.

But scientism is a scam (see parts 1, 2, 3 & 4). Although it sounds intelligent on paper, it is just a Brave-New-World-style cover story for something that goes like this:

Data on literally everything—and the harvesting and management of this data—will be used to track and trace society and the planet.

Everything will have a price tag: walking, driving, eating, sleeping, buying, selling, etc. Since everything, including an ordinary apple (or even a blade of grass), will essentially have a value and a barcode—“the system” will be able to manage the world for the benefit of all its parts.

Facebook, Google, Amazon, our smartphones, GPS trackers in our cars—our behaviors in general—are how we actively participate in collecting and constructing the required data sets.

As Yuval Noah Harari explains it:

If you have enough data, and enough computer power, then you can create an algorithm that understands humans better than they understand themselves. This has been kind of the holy grail of governments and armies and corporations for thousands of years: to understand humans better than they understand themselves, to be able to predict them, to be able to manipulate them.

Scientific “EXPERTS” in every field help the system to score everything (even the most mundane aspects of reality) based on 1. the vast quantities of data we are feeding the beast and 2. the prejudices built into the system by the EXPERTS themselves.

In my worldview, the “germ theory”—the theory that small particles called viruses cause disease—is a flawed scientific theory. I am also highly suspicious of genetics and of the various conclusions surrounding genes, inherited disease, the discovery of the double helix, etc.

But here’s the thing...

Whether viruses are real or whether mRNA vaccines are real—NO LONGER MATTERS!

COVID-19 was the complete test run of a SYSTEM that PRESUMES that viruses are not only real but also TRACKABLE, TRACEABLE, and TREATABLE.

It doesn’t matter whether any of the links in this chain (trackable-traceable-treatable) have chinks in them or if any of them might be totally untrue. Not anymore.

It only matters that they were CLAIMED TO BE TRUE the first time. And that society, by and large, has ACCEPTED THEM AS FACTS and has since moved on.

In other words…

After COVID and what was “claimed to be” a successful and accurate DNA/PCR-testing program followed by a successful mRNA/DNA-treatment program (including vaccines and anti-virals)—which was performed on an EPIC, WORLDWIDE STAGE and simultaneously documented in the human record (three years of media stories), and declared a success by governments everywhere—there is nothing to debate.

The debate has been rendered irrelevant.

From this point on, should the WHO (or any other health authority, like Health Canada, for example) have the power to declare a HOT SPOT [a flu-bug zone, a mind-virus region (or subgroup), a climate disturbance, a dangerously infected individual]—all that will be required (once the appropriate framework is signed off on) is to say that the threat has been MEASURED, IDENTIFIED, LABELED, TRACKED and TRACED.

The “disease,” whatever they LABEL IT (and notice the normalization of using variant labels such as BA.2.A6), can then be managed by the system. Worldwide lockdowns will no longer be required.

Suppose the “flu bug” is only happening in sector C-4. In this case, steps will be implemented immediately to ISOLATE and TREAT IT without disrupting other sectors’ lives (and without raising outside suspicions).

As time rolls on, and as the data sets and test runs get faster and more refined—even so-called “thought viruses” will become part of the routine and will get worked into the system:

Genetic experiments will have been done by EXPERTS and published in peer-reviewed EXPERT JOURNALS, which (using graphs and science-sounding words) will prove that specific “thoughts” or “thought patterns” can be genetically isolated.

It will take a little time as the program rolls ahead and becomes more commonplace. But won’t it be wonderful when everything—every disease under the sun—has been “proved” to have been caused by a measurable genetic code that is then treatable with a genetic code antidote?

The horror story behind the creation of Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines was the speed with which they were able to spit out an “antidote code”—to create a vaccine. In Moderna’s case, it took two days. And the reason why the fact-checking industrial complex has never disputed “this fact” is because faith in this concept [the concept that a computer (aka in silico) genome can be detected and created at stealth] is an essential part of this new, scientism healthcare system.

If the idea of a “thought virus” that can be genetically isolated sounds far-fetched, consider the HPV vaccine—the vaccine TO PREVENT cervical cancer. Not only was the HPV injection (for future cancer!) quickly sold to the public for use in adolescent girls, but it was effortlessly also sold to the general public for its effectiveness in pre-treating cervical-lacking teenage boys.

So, it doesn’t matter that the methods for treating EXISTING CANCER have essentially not changed in decades!

What matters is that they have managed to trick the public into believing that they can PREVENT CANCER by injecting a chemical into a body DECADES IN ADVANCE of even the hint of a diagnosis!

COVID-19 vaccines were an all-too-recent example of an “inoculating agent” having zero ability to inoculate anyone. Yet it was such a hit based on the frail claim that it could supposedly reduce symptoms (whatever that means). And the generally insane public was perfectly okay with this!

The other piece of this surveillance health model is the Central Bank Digital Currency.

Linking individuals to a blockchain bank account centrally controlled and tied to a centrally controlled “health” security hub—creates the recipe for behavioral planning on a level previously unimaginable.

Since this is the final article in this series on scientism, I’ll leave you with this:

Faith in science (or science & medicine) as the trusted source of truth and understanding is no less dangerous than faith in an authoritarian religion or a tyrannical government. As long as enough people believe in something [and enough people go along with something (whether they believe in it or not)], you have a recipe for controlling large populations.

Misguided faith in anything can be dangerous to your health.